Attention as currency: the academic framing

The phrase "attention economy" enters the academic literature via Goldhaber's 1997 essay in First Monday.

Goldhaber's argument was that attention — finite, non-renewable, scarce — would replace material goods as the bottleneck resource of advanced economies. Two decades later, the framing has become the dominant lens for thinking about consumer technology and advertising.

Goldhaber: "The kind of economy that grows from the dependence on a vast and growing number of media-like enterprises is one based on the gaining and paying of attention… The currency of the new economy won't be money, but attention." — Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). "The Attention Economy and the Net." First Monday, 2(4).

The empirical work that followed has confirmed the framing's predictive value. Studies of advertising effectiveness, social-media engagement, and platform business models consistently find that attention — measured as time-on-task, engagement minutes, or repeat-visit frequency — is the scarce resource over which platforms compete.

What the modern subscription economy has done is layer subscription revenue on top of the attention model rather than replacing it. Ad-supported streaming tiers monetize both: the subscription fee and the attention spent watching ads, which is itself sold to advertisers. The economics literature is increasingly clear that these are not separate business models but complementary ones.

For the consumer, the implication is two costs per subscription, not one: the dollar cost on the statement and the attention cost of the time inside the app. Evaluating a subscription on dollar cost alone systematically underestimates what it actually takes from you.

References

• Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). First Monday, 2(4).

Related: Dopamine · App switching · Notification fatigue